Chapter One: Introduction
1.1 Background of the Study
Media framing refers to the ways in which news stories are structured to emphasize certain aspects of an issue, guiding public interpretation and perception. In the context of national security, the framing of news significantly influences how people perceive threats, risks, and government responses. Katsina-Ala LGA, with its unique socio-political challenges, has experienced varying narratives around security concerns. Media outlets, both local and national, frame security stories in ways that can either alleviate fear or escalate tension. Understanding how media framing affects the public's perception of national security is critical for evaluating its role in fostering informed and resilient communities (Adamu & Eze, 2024).
1.2 Statement of the Problem
Despite the media's critical role in reporting security matters, there is growing concern about the potential for biased or sensationalized framing to distort public perception. In Katsina-Ala LGA, such framing may exacerbate tensions, misinform residents, or undermine trust in security agencies. This study seeks to explore the influence of media framing on public perception of national security and the implications for societal cohesion.
1.3 Objectives of the Study
1.4 Research Questions
1.5 Research Hypotheses
1.6 Significance of the Study
This study provides insights into the relationship between media narratives and public perception of security, offering valuable guidance for journalists, policymakers, and security agencies to improve communication strategies and mitigate the negative effects of biased framing.
1.7 Scope and Limitations of the Study
The study focuses on media framing of national security issues in Katsina-Ala LGA, Benue State. It does not cover other LGAs or broader national contexts.
1.8 Operational Definition of Terms